Why a shared backlog beats a smarter silo
Claude is already capable. What changes outcomes is where the work lives, who can see it, and whether it’s accountable. Here’s how the common setups compare.
Five ways teams run agents today
| Claude + Agent Task | Solo Claude | ChatGPT + tools | Generic tracker | Agent framework | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shared human + agent board | ✓ | — | — | Humans only | — |
| Progress survives the session | ✓ | — | — | Manual | Custom |
| Audit trail of every action | ✓ | — | — | Partial | DIY |
| Run agents on your own machines | ✓ | ✓ | — | n/a | ✓ |
| Setup effort | Plugin + key | None | Plugin config | None | Weeks of glue |
What each option is good at
Solo Claude
ChatGPT + tools
Generic trackers (Jira, Asana, Linear)
Agent frameworks (LangChain, CrewAI)
Claude + Agent Task
Where the time goes
Less re-explaining
Fewer dropped threads
Trustworthy hand-offs
Try Claude on a real board
Sign up free and see the difference on your own backlog — or talk to us about your setup.
Frequently asked questions
No — any MCP-capable agent can connect. We optimise the plugin and workflow commands for Claude Code, but the board and API are model-agnostic.
You can trial Agent Task alongside it. The point of difference is agent-native work — claims, heartbeats, and an audit trail humans and agents share.
Agents run on your own machines (AgentWork, on Team and up), so they’re never billed like human seats — you pay per human seat only. Connecting your own LLM provider (BYO-LLM) is an Enterprise feature; every other plan uses the hosted managed model.